When the Tables Turn: The Classic Case of Ranveer Allahbadia (India's Got Latent)

 


India’s political discourse over the last decade, in my opinion, has evolved into something almost experimental—a living case study of power dynamics and shifting allegiances. Think of it like a Netflix documentary of say 2070, which will trace the country's and its media's evolution starting 2014. 

From relentless 'bhakts' to the often unchecked narratives of the 'godi media', the landscape can turn into a fascinating social experiment, one where the ultimate outcome may shock many when the dust finally settles.

There’s always a common belief among those who support with winning side, you have the power to dictate terms and call out anyone who dares to oppose. This group, confident in their ironclad position, often forgets one timeless truth, change is the only constant. Their collective self-assurance is less about genuine influence and more about the illusion of power—a fleeting state that can evaporate in the blink of an eye.

Consider the case of Ranveer Allahbadia and the latest India's Got Latent controversy. 

Less than a year ago, he was everywhere—interviewing top politicians, movie stars, and businessmen, he even received an award from the Prime Minister. His YouTube views and social media garnered lakhs of views. His life seemed gilded by the perks of being everyone's darling. However, as the winds of public opinion shifted, his once-glittering persona is quickly dimmed. The same circles that once cheered him on, showered him with compliments, and handed out accolades, suddenly went silent.

I do not mean to single him out, but I do feel like I should point out that this is a wake-up call to all those who think that the hate they spew or the empty support that they have presumed they have, or the media they control, makes them invincible. 

The reality is stark, even the loudest voices, and the biggest supporters, are merely small clogs in a vast, ever-turning machinery. 

No matter how indispensable they believe themselves to be, history and public sentiment are not easily swayed by empty bravado.

This controversy serves as a reminder that power is fleeting. When the tables turn—as they inevitably will—the very forces that once seemed powerful and secure will find themselves powerless.

I would like to clear out that I am not hating on Ranveer, but merely pointing out how times change. As for my opinion about the whole controversy, I think Faye D’Souza has covered it really well, and I second that. 


Comments