- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Pink is the talk of the town, I recently saw the movie and loved it. However when discussing the movie with colleagues, we shared some observations. And I think I am going to say that the girls really did take money.
I tweeted the reasons and sharing the same here. Would love to know your opinion and thoughts about the movie in the comments below.
I tweeted the reasons and sharing the same here. Would love to know your opinion and thoughts about the movie in the comments below.
People who saw #Pink , here's a quick question: were the girls prostitutes or no?— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
RT please, need to know what the majority thinks
I saw #Pink yesterday and loved the movie. Was discussing the same with colleagues today and an interesting observation came to our notice— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
The following tweets are spoilers. So Spoiler Alert! #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
The first thing that bothered me was why would those girls go to the separate rooms, as the movie processed they gave explanations #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
I bought the explanations and made my peace with the movie #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
But there are a few things which went unnoticed and when I contemplated later the movie makes much better sense #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
I believe that the girls were really escorts. And the following tweets are the reasons. Would like to hear your take on this— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
#Pink
First clue was the Didi that Minal speaks to at the start of the movie. Who is Didi? Why did she not show up later in the movie? #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
In 1 short seen the Didi tells her that the show was nice and people want to meet her. Which show? Why is the profession not revealed? #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
I dismissed the same assuming she was in theater/showbiz industry. #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
But this Didi does seem an interesting character in the movie
The 2nd clue was from Falak's workplace, a questionable picture of her is shown to Falak and she doesn't defend herself #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
She quietly just accepts the fact and moves on. She doesn't even say that it's morphed or any other explanation #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
It seems more like she understood that her cover is blown up and now there is no point trying to hide more. #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
Also Minal's kidnapping and the "morphed" picture ( believing it was planted by the guys) never comes up in the court. #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
Were the girls trying to hide certain facts? #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
The going to the rooms can be easily understood if we believe that they were escorts #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
.@SrBachchan is shown composed and calm throughout the case but when Falak starts to give up under pressure in the court. #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
He tells her to be quite. More like he didn't want her to say something #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
And when Falak does accept that they took money, Minal and Andrea are not shocked but disappointed. #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
It felt like they had decided to maintain a certain story but Falak gave in to the pressure #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
This also explains Minal slapping Falak after the scene and hugging her immediately. Shows the bond #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
This easily explains why they went to the rooms in the first place #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
The point I am trying to make is even considering that they were escorts. If they say No it means NO! #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
I feel that this way the movie makes much more impact. #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
Over and out #Pink— Pooja Mahimkar (@PoojaMahimkar) September 22, 2016
http://images.indianexpress.com/2016/09/pink-delhi-actress-759.jpg |
Comments
Indeed a No is a No! No matter who says it, be it an Escort or otherwise.
ReplyDeletexoxo Chaicy
Style.. A pastiche! - styleapastiche.com
Totally agree!
DeleteHmmm Actually there are GREY spots too sometimes.. I worked in a profession for 14 years and have seen a lot ..
ReplyDeleteand I dont believe in these Polls .. the 100% people who voted as NO .. they were not prostitutes How many of them actually went with the Flow.. since everyone was saying NO so they said No :)
but yeah a NO means NO.. for sure
Bikram's
that is exactly what I feel as well
DeleteI am still waiting for the best post.
ReplyDeleteCheck it out for more information about Backpage alternative. eBackpage Alternative
My two cents... Characterization was poor and cinematography/picturization definitely could have been more natural and unaffected. The storyline had huge potential but there are big loopholes, either intentional or inadvertant. I think. The actings were powerful but I thought at times there were too much of an effort on display. However the message of the movie is steadfast, no dispute in that... No means No, and the writer/director does a good job to pulling back the storyline to the matter of consent and not character. Overall a great effort with an intense message, but could've been better executed.
ReplyDeleteSaw it today, therefore commenting on it 6 months too late.
But on the escort issue, agree with your investigative findings. Does make a credible case that they were in the profession.
Completely agree with your review
Delete